“Penal substitution is more than unjust, it is by definition impossible!” This line of thought represents an important objection leveled … Continue reading Can Legal Philosophy Help Us Make Sense of Penal Substitution? (TGC Canada)
An article I wrote defending a version of penal substitutionary atonement just came out in “Neue Zeitschrift fĂĽr Systematische Theologie … Continue reading Do We Believe in Consequences? Revisiting the “Incoherence Objection” to Penal Substitution
I just picked up the 2nd edition of William Lane Craig & J.P. Moreland’s Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview … Continue reading A Penal Substitutionary Doctrine of Atonement (Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview Pt. 1)
It is well known that some of Edward’s followers, sometimes known as the New Divinity, advocated for a view of … Continue reading Jonathan Edwards on the Atonement (Review)
The atonement is the subject of intense interest among not only theologians, but Christians in general. This may be due … Continue reading Sacrifice and Atonement
In Exploring Christology and Atonement: Conversations with John McLeod Campbell, H.R. Mackintosh and T.F. Torrance Andrew Purves unites two often … Continue reading Exploring Christology and Atonement with CMT
Just a few weeks ago, the third volume of the Journal of Analytic Theology was released… We are very pleased … Continue reading The Journal of Analyitic Theology (Vol. 3)
It’s a sort of tricky question. How does Barth understand Penal Substitution? I was once told that Barth definitely saw … Continue reading Does Karl Barth Hold to a Version of Penal Substitution?
Yesterday we took a brief look at a quote from Edwards that has been spun into a rather interesting theory … Continue reading Jonathan Edwards Week – Edwards and Atonement (Pt. 2)
What does Jonathan Edwards believe when it comes to atonement? Well, its nothing terribly interesting – he takes the traditional … Continue reading Jonathan Edwards Week – Edwards and Atonement
